90+ Countries / 200+ Routes

International VPN server locations and route types

Choose an entry point based on your destination, geographic distance, and route structure. vpnLi offers IEPL, relay, and direct routes across Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, and other regions for international websites, regional content, AI tools, remote work, and interactive applications.

14-day refunds Unlimited simultaneous devices No email address required
Regional routes

Explore server entry points by region

The table shows common city entry points and route structures by region. Regional content depends on the target service, account region, exit location, and the service’s own rules. “Supports regional content access” means the route can serve as an entry point for that region; it does not guarantee identical results across all services or times.

Country City Route type Streaming
Asia-Pacific
Japan Tokyo IEPL Supports regional content access
Japan Osaka Relay Supports regional content access
Singapore Singapore IEPL Supports regional content access
South Korea Seoul Relay Supports regional content access
Australia Sydney Direct Test with your target platform
North America
United States Los Angeles IEPL Supports regional content access
United States Seattle Relay Supports regional content access
United States New York Direct Test with your target platform
Canada Toronto Relay Supports regional content access
Europe
United Kingdom London IEPL Supports regional content access
Germany Frankfurt Relay Supports regional content access
France Paris Direct Test with your target platform
Netherlands Amsterdam Relay Supports regional content access
Other regions
United Arab Emirates Dubai Relay Test with your target platform
Brazil São Paulo Direct Test with your target platform
South Africa Johannesburg Direct Test with your target platform
About the route list

This page lists regional entry points to illustrate the coverage structure. vpnLi covers 90+ countries / 200+ routes overall. Sign in to the user panel to see routes available under your plan. Route names and entry points may change during maintenance or resource scheduling; use the routes shown in the client as the source of truth.

Route structure

IEPL, relay, and direct routes compared

Route names describe how data is organized between the local network and the target exit. They are not standalone speed ratings: the same route type can perform differently by region, carrier network, and time of day. Understanding the path structure is more useful than judging a route by its label alone.

IEPL

IEPL

IEPL routes use a dedicated transport segment across the international link. Data typically enters through a designated access point before following a planned international path to the exit region. Compared with connections that rely entirely on public networks, these routes prioritize path control and suit sustained transfers, video calls, remote desktops, extended streaming, and workflows sensitive to connection fluctuations.

Dedicated transport resources generally cost more to build and maintain, so service providers manage entry and exit capacity more carefully. Choose a node that matches the target service region. If the destination is in Europe, using an Asian route long-term solely because the Asian entry is closer may add another cross-region leg and may be less suitable than a European entry point.

RELAY

Relay routes

A relay route first sends the connection to an intermediate node suited to the access network, then forwards it to the target region. The goal is to avoid an unfavorable direct path between the local network and a distant exit, allowing the entry and international transport segments to use better-suited networks. A relay is not necessarily slower; a well-chosen relay can reduce unnecessary network hops.

These routes suit everyday international websites, AI tools, research, and routine content playback, while providing an alternative path across different carrier networks. Their cost usually falls between dedicated transport and ordinary direct connections. Check that the relay region follows a sensible path: for Japanese services, start with an Asia-Pacific relay; for North American services, compare North American entry points first.

DIRECT

Direct routes

A direct route connects the local network straight to the target exit without an additional relay entry point from the service. Its path is simple and works well when the local network already has good connectivity to the target region. It is also commonly used for regions that are farther away or have more distributed demand. Direct performance depends more heavily on the local carrier and the public international network’s routing at the time.

Resource allocation is relatively straightforward, and the cost structure is usually lower than dedicated transport. However, routing may change more noticeably across networks, continents, or busy periods. Direct does not simply mean “closest” or “fastest.” If the connection is unstable, try a relay in the same region instead of immediately switching to a geographically unrelated exit.

Start with the use case, then compare route types

The route type determines how the path is organized, while the actual experience also depends on the local network, target service location, exit region, and application connection method.

Sustained transfers

For remote work, longer meetings, or continuous playback, start with the target region’s IEPL route, then compare a relay entry in the same region.

General access

For websites, research, and routine applications, start with a relay route close to the destination to balance path quality and coverage.

Remote regions

When the destination is in a less concentrated coverage area, a direct route may be the more straightforward entry. If performance is unstable, switch to a relay in a nearby region.

Use-case matching

Choose a route for your use case

The key is not to stay with one country, but to align the exit region, target service region, and application behavior as closely as possible. Use the following as a starting point, then switch between routes in the same region based on actual results.

Everyday browsing and research

For everyday international websites, a nearby Asia-Pacific entry with a shorter path is often a practical starting point. If the site is mainly hosted in North America or Europe, choose that region directly to avoid another cross-region leg after the exit. When opening several sites, do not chase a different region for each one; settle on a stable entry overall, then switch only for services with specific regional requirements.

If a page loads but images, attachments, or sign-in flows are incomplete, compare IEPL, relay, and direct routes in the same region first rather than switching repeatedly across continents. This makes it easier to determine whether the issue comes from route structure, service detection, or the local network.

Streaming and regional content

For streaming, choose the exit based on the content region: start with Japan for Japanese content and the United States for US content. Once the region matches, compare dedicated and relay routes within that region. Streaming platforms may also consider exit location, account region, and their own policies, so a reachable route does not guarantee an identical catalog.

If playback buffers frequently, pause background sync and large file transfers before switching to another route in the same region. Keeping the region unchanged helps reduce repeated changes to the content catalog and sign-in state.

AI tools and developer services

AI tools often involve sign-in, conversations, file uploads, and persistent connections, making exit-region consistency important. Prefer a stable route in a region supported by the target service and keep the same exit during a work session. Services such as Claude may adjust accessible regions under their own rules; the target service’s result is authoritative.

If ordinary websites work but conversation requests fail, try another relay or IEPL route in the same region and re-establish the application connection. When using both an API and a web interface, keeping both on the same path makes troubleshooting easier.

Online games and interactive apps

Interactive apps depend more on a stable round-trip path than on simply pursuing a distant exit. Confirm the game or service region first, then choose an entry in the same or a nearby region. For a server in Japan, start with Tokyo or Osaka; for western North America, compare Los Angeles and Seattle.

When the connection behaves unexpectedly, close the old connection and let the app establish a new session. Switching routes without reconnecting may leave the existing session on the old path and distort the comparison.

Remote work and collaboration

Remote desktops, video meetings, code repositories, and workplace collaboration tools often require persistent connections. Prefer an exit matching the company service, cloud platform, or collaboration region, and keep the route unchanged during work when possible. IEPL is a useful first option, with a same-region relay as an alternative. Follow the organization’s network requirements if its systems use a fixed-region access policy.

For work, avoid having backups, system updates, and meetings compete for the same connection. If one application behaves abnormally, check the browser, desktop client, and remote connection separately rather than judging the entire route by whether one webpage opens. vpnLi supports Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux and unlimited simultaneous devices, making it easier to keep regional choices consistent across everyday devices.

Troubleshooting order

Keep comparisons consistent when switching routes

Switching between multiple countries repeatedly and without a clear order makes it difficult to identify the cause of a change. A better approach is to fix the target region first, then change one route type or city at a time so each comparison alters only one major condition.

Target region

Confirm where the service is actually located

Choose regional content by its content region, workplace systems by the company service region, and AI tools by their supported regions. Do not confuse “close to the local network” with “close to the destination.” The connection still has to reach the target after the exit, so matching the exit region to the target region is usually easier to understand and troubleshoot.

Same-region comparison

Compare route structures within one region

After choosing a country, compare its IEPL, relay, and direct routes first. If switching routes restores access, continue observing your regular applications. If routes in the same region perform similarly, consider a nearby region rather than jumping straight to a distant exit.

Reconnect

Let the application establish a new network session

Some browser tabs, desktop applications, and streaming clients keep existing connections open. After switching routes, refresh the page or reopen the relevant application. For sign-in sessions, save any work in progress before reconnecting so an old session does not affect the test.

Keep your regular choices

Record stable entries by use case

Everyday browsing, regional content, and workplace systems may work best with different exits. Keep frequently used regions in the client and choose by situation instead of treating one route as the answer for every application. If an entry changes during maintenance, use the same process to find an alternative in the same region.

Change one condition at a time

When testing routes, pause large file transfers and background sync and keep the target unchanged. First change the route type in the same city, then the city in the same country, and only then compare nearby countries. This order makes differences between the local network, path structure, and target service easier to identify.

Coverage

90+ Countries / 200+ Routes

vpnLi routes connect to international websites, content services, AI tools, and remote collaboration platforms in different regions. Server entry points may change with maintenance, regional resources, and connection scheduling, so this page does not show fixed latency, load, or bandwidth figures. Check the signed-in user panel and client list for currently available routes.

The main difference between plans is monthly data: ¥9.9/month includes 60GB, ¥18/month includes 250GB, and ¥28/month includes 500GB. Data resets monthly on the activation date, and mid-cycle upgrades are prorated for the remaining days. Every plan provides access to currently available routes and supports unlimited simultaneous devices. If the first payment does not meet your needs, request a full refund within 14 days.

Asia-Pacific North America Europe Japan Singapore South Korea United States Canada United Kingdom Germany France Australia
Start Free